• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Industry
    • Exhibits and Support & Visibility Opportunities
    • Industry Archives
  • Meetings
    • 2023 Annual Meeting
    • NASBS Skull Base Surgery Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Abstracts
    • 2023 Call for Abstracts
    • NASBS Poster Archives
  • Journal
  • Educational Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Log In

Survey Review

  • Survey to Review:

  • Max. file size: 512 MB.
  • Scoring System

    A composite score is generated based on a 5-point scale, and scored for each domain listed below. Please use the scoring guidelines associated with each domain.
  • Significance: Is the study topic relevant and significant to North American Skull Base Society membership?
    1 – Very significant: Important priority that is very likely to affect practice
    2 -Significant: Probably important and is likely to affect practice
    3 – Uncertain significance: Could possibly affect practice
    4-Likely not significant: Unlikely to affect practice
    5 – Not significant: Not a priority and will not affect practice
  • Innovation: Is the study question novel?
    1 – Very novel: Fundamentally new study question
    2 – Novel: New/useful way to address an old question
    3 – Somewhat novel: Will provide some new information
    4 – Update of data: The study has largely been done before, but updates old information
    5 – Not novel: The same study has been recently published and/or is ongoing
  • Audience: Is the study question broad enough to accrue a sufficient number of respondents from the NASBS membership? A greater audience will allow for a greater number of potential respondents and possibly more survey responses.
    1 Very broad audience: Relevant to entire NASBS membership
    2– Broad audience: Relevant to multiple, but not all subspecialties
    3 – Somewhat broad audience: Relevant to multiple subspecialties, but limited in scope (anterior skull base, orbit, endonasal surgery, temporal bone, etc.)
    4 – Limited audience: Relevant to only one subspecialty
    5– Not relevant: Not relevant to NASBS membership
  • Approach: Based on the methods described, how likely is this study to confirm or refute the study hypothesis
    1 – Very likely: Among the top 10% of submissions
    2 – Likely: Among the top 11-25% of submissions
    3 – Intermediate: Among the top 26-50% of submissions
    4 – Unlikely: In the bottom 50% of submissions
    5– Very unlikely: Fundamentally scientifically flawed
  • Hidden
  • Hidden

Copyright © 2023 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved