• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Industry
    • Exhibits and Support & Visibility Opportunities
    • Industry Archives
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2025 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2025 Proffered Presentations

2025 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S181: SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF SPONTANEOUS LATERAL CEREBROSPINAL FLUID LEAKS AND ENCEPHALOCELES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Akash M Bhat1; Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez2; Shaun A Nguyen, MD, FAPCR3; Robert F Labadie, MD, PhD3; Ted A Meyer, MD, PhD3; 1Drexel University College of Medicine; 2University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine; 3Medical University of South Carolina

Objectives: To comprehensively examine the characteristics and outcomes of surgical repair of spontaneous lateral cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and encephaloceles.

Databases Reviewed: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, databases were searched from inception to April 3, 2024, for studies reporting patient characteristics and outcomes of surgical repair of spontaneous lateral skull base defects by surgical approach, including transmastoid (TM), middle cranial fossa (MCF), and combined TM/MCF approaches. Meta-analysis of continuous measures (age), proportions (%) (gender, surgical approach utilization, repair material utilization, surgical success rates, complication rates), and mean differences (Δ) (pure tone average [PTA] and air-bone gap [ABG]) were performed.

Results: Fifty-one studies were included, consisting of 1,406 patients undergoing 1,493 surgeries. Of the included patients, 60.0% of all patients were females and the mean age was 57.6 years (range: 6 to 92 years). All included patients had a spontaneous lateral CSF leak and/or encephalocele. The most used surgical approach for lateral skull base defect repair was the MCF approach (42.5%; 95% CI: 27.5% to 58.4%). CSF leaks were most commonly repaired via a 3-material multilayer approach (34.7%; 95% CI: 21.9% to 48.8%). The most frequently utilized repair material was temporalis fascia (80.9%; 95% CI: 67.85 to 91.2%). The surgical success rate without recurrence for lateral skull base defect repairs via all approaches was 92.8% (95% CI: 91.4% to 94.1%). Repair via the combined approach led to the greatest surgical success rate (95.2%; 95% CI: 91.7% to 97.5%), followed by the MCF approach (93.0%; 95% CI: 90.7% to 94.9%) and the TM approach (88.9%; 95% CI: 83.1% to 93.6%). Surgical success rate was significantly higher via the combined approach (Δ6.3%; 95% CI: 1.8% to 10.5%; P=0.0076) and the MCF approach (Δ4.2%; 95% CI: 0.5% to 8.3%; P=0.026) compared to the TM approach. There was no significant difference in success rates between the combined approach and the MCF approach (Δ2.2%; 95% CI: -1.9% to 5.3%; P=0.26). Surgical repair across approaches significantly improved average PTA by 5.9 dB (95% CI: 3.8 to 8.1; P<0.0001) and reduced ABG by 8.2 dB (95% CI: 5.9 to 10.5; P<0.0001). The complication rate excluding leak recurrence for all repairs was 6.3% (95% CI: 4.9% to 7.8%). Complication rates per approach ranged from 3.2% (TM approach) to 8.9% (MCF approach).

Conclusions: Surgical repair of spontaneous lateral CSF leaks and encephaloceles is safe and effective, with a low probability of recurrence, improved hearing, and low complication rate. Repairs via the combined TM/MCF approach led to the lowest recurrence rate.

Figure. 1: PRISMA diagram.

Figure 1: PRISMA diagram.

Figure 2. Forest plot of meta-proportions for surgical success rate without recurrence of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, for all surgical approaches.

Figure 2: Forest plot of meta-proportions for surgical success rate without recurrence of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, for all surgical approaches.

Figure 3A. Forest plot of mean differences for PTA following surgical repair of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, via all surgical approaches.

Figure 3A: Forest plot of mean differences for PTA following surgical repair of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, vial all surgical approaches.

Figure 3B. Forest plot of mean differences for ABG following surgical repair of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, via all surgical approaches.

Figure 3B: Forest plot of mean differences for ABG following surgical repair of spontaneous CSF leak and/or encephalocele, via all surgical approaches.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2025 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved