• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Industry
    • Exhibits and Support & Visibility Opportunities
    • Industry Archives
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2025 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2025 Proffered Presentations

2025 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S059: SKULL BASE CHORDOMA: AUTOMATED DETECTION AND SEGMENTATION USING RADIOMICS
Daniela Stastna1; Richard Mannion2; Robert Macfarlane2; Rishi Sharna2; Neil Donnelly2; James Tysome2; Danieli Borsetto2; Ari Ercole1; Jonathan Coles, Prof1; 1University of Cambridge; 2Skull Base unit, University of Cambridge

Introduction: Skull base chordomas are rare,locally destructive,and recurrent pathologies,originating from remnant of notochord in the spheno-occipital synchondrosis.Skull base chordoma share similar location,radiologic features,growth pattern,and clinical presentation with chondrosarcoma.The radiological distinction between chordoma and chondrosarcoma/or  postoperative changes is often challenging.

In our study we aimed to create a radiomics model solving these problems:

  • Distinction of the pathology (clival chordoma/chondrosarcoma)
  • Distinction of the chordoma recurrence/residue from postoperative/post-radiotherapy changes
  • Automatic detection and segmentation of chordoma,
  • Dichotomization of the chordoma into low-risk/ high-risk tumor residues

Methods: This study included 36 patients operated for  clival chordoma,9 chondrosarcomas. Anonymized, pre-processed pre-/postoperative MRI were collected for each patient: CET1wMRI, T2wMRI, FLAIR.

Due to the very low number of patients in the study, we could not apply solely neural network(NN), instead we performed combined radiomics,including feature extraction,and binary classification models( LASSO,Boosting methods, and sequential NN(Multi-layered Perceptron,MPL).The MPL was feedforward-SNN including 3layers of neurons with RELU function.More than 4000 combined features were calculated for each patient.

Semi-automated segmentation was initiated with 5x5voxel manual “seed”,expanded using our active contour” algorithm,filtered by feature-map (highest Shapley score).The “seed” in the fully automated detection of chordoma was intercept within the predefined midline FOV by feature-based map. Dice coefficient score were calculated for predicted and ground truth segmentation. All processes were provided by our algorithm written in Python 3.8.8 (SimpleITL library, Python, Keras).

Results:

1. Distinction of histology class

The distinction of the skull base chordoma from chondrosarcoma from the preoperative imaging of 3 sequences was performed on the augmented cohort including 45 patients.

The best performing radiomics model was XGBoost model based on extraction of  combined features, with MSE :0.175, AUC:0.77, accuracy=0.81(95%CI 0.74-0.94). 3-layered MLP achieved the accuracy of 0.875,MSE 0.195, but the unbalanced complexity of the model is visible from training and validation loss.

2. Distinction of real chordoma residue from postoperative changes

Model was trained on 21 chordoma residues versus 30 randomly created ROI “fake residues” in known postoperative cases. The best performing XGBoost model achieved performance:  MSE: 0.14,  AUC:  AUC= 0.87, Accuracy =0.8(95%CI 0.66- 0.95).

3. Automated segmentation part

The automated segmentation model based on “manual seed” achieved mean DICE coefficients 0.92,0.94, 0.88 for tumor based on T2wMRI, CET1wMRI,and FLAIR sequences, respectively. (Figure1).

Automated segmentation part with automatic detection of  seeding voxels: The mean DICE scores for automatic segmentation were  0.85,0.89, 0.82 for T2wMRI, CET1wMRI and FLAIR sequences.

4. Dichotomization into high-risk/low-risk chordoma from postoperative MRI of residue

The best performing radiomics model was XGBoost of all 3 sequences, with performance metrics: MSE: 0.12, AUC= 0.96, Accuracy 0.8(95%CI 0.59- 0.94).(Figure 2)

Conclusions: Despite limitations such as small size of dataset and heterogeneous origin of imaging,our MRI-based machine learning model distinguishes with a good accuracy the chordoma from chondrosarcoma,or postoperative changes.

The model of automated segmentation based on the intercept of feature based-matrix and active contour algorithm had a surprisingly high accuracy in comparison to ground-truth segmentation.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2025 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved