• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Industry
    • Exhibits and Support & Visibility Opportunities
    • Industry Archives
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2025 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2025 Proffered Presentations

2025 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S050: GRADED SKULL BASE RECONSTRUCTION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC PITUITARY SURGERY
Claudio A Callejas, MD1; Kyle K VanKoevering, MD2; Kyle C Wu, MD2; Kathleen Kelly, MD2; Lucas P Carlstrom, MD, PhD3; Daniel M Prevedello, MD, MBA2; Ricardo L Carrau, MD, MBA2; 1The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; 2The Ohio State University; 3Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Introduction: There is no universally accepted method for skull base reconstruction following endoscopic pituitary surgery. Different teams worldwide adopt techniques that work best for them based on their experience. We describe our current graded approach to skull base reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary surgery and presents our results with this approach.

Methods: Based primarily on the presence and magnitude of an intraoperative CSF leak, assessed using the grading system described by Esposito et al. (2007), we classified the risk of a postoperative CSF leak as low (grades 0 and 1), moderate (grade 2), or high (grade 3). Collagen matrix was used as first layer of reconstruction to lift and support the pituitary gland and diaphragm, preventing diaphragm tears and stalk stretching caused by significant diaphragm descent. A second layer of autologous tissue was used in all cases. For a low risk of postoperative CSF leak, a free mucoperiosteum graft or sphenoid mucosa was used. For a moderate risk of postoperative CSF leak, a free mucoperiosteum graft with a non-reabsorbable nasal packing as a firm bolster to buttress the reconstruction or a nasoseptal flap without a non-reabsorbable nasal packing was used. Finally, for a high risk of postoperative CSF leak, a nasoseptal flap with a non-reabsorbable nasal packing to buttress the reconstruction was used. Non-reabsorbable nasal packing was removed at day 5-7 post op. Seventy consecutive patients with pituitary tumors were retrospectively collected at our institution between 7/12/23 and 6/14/24. Patients with Rathke's cleft cyst were not included. 

Results: The postoperative CSF leak rate was 1.42% (1/70). We had 1 case of postoperative central nervous system infection (meningitis). The intraoperative CSF leak rate was 37% (26/70), corresponding to 18 grade 1, 5 grade 2, and 3 grade 3 CSF leaks. Collagen matrix was used for reconstruction in all cases. Free grafts were used in 60 cases (54 from middle turbinate mucoperiosteum and 6 from nasal floor mucoperiosteum), with nasoseptal flap used in 6 cases and sphenoid mucosa in 4 cases. Neither fat nor biologic glue were used.

Conclusion: The described graded approach to skull base reconstruction after pituitary surgery has enabled us to achieve excellent outcomes while minimizing patient morbidity. Minimizing the rate of intraoperative CSF leak without compromising tumor resection is key to reduce morbidity associated with reconstruction.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2025 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved