• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2027 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Proffered Presentations

2026 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S202: FOUR TRANSORBITAL APPROACHES TO THE SKULL BASE. SURGICAL NUANCES AND INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH 212 CASES.
Maria Karampouga1,2; Buvic Patel1,3; Gregory J Varga1; Anna. K Terrarosa4; David T Fernandes-Cabral1; Garret W Choby5; Eric Wang5; Carl H Snyderman5; Susan T Stefko4; Paul A Gardner1; Georgios A Zenonos1; 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Nicosia General Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus; 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 5Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Background: Transorbital approaches have emerged as an innovative and increasingly utilized skull base corridor. This study presents a comprehensive institutional overview of four variations of keyhole transorbital approaches, aiming to delineate their indications, advantages, and limitations.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our institutional experience with the following transorbital approaches: 1) Eyebrow incision and supraorbital craniotomy (EbSOA), 2) Eyebrow incision and modified orbitozygomatic approach (EbMOZ), 3) Eyelid incision and modified orbitozygomatic approach (ElMOZ) and 4) Lateral Canthus incision + lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA).

Results: Two hundred and twelve patients underwent transorbital approaches at our institution over the last decade.  Of those, 152 (72%) underwent an eyebrow incision either for tumor (47%) or vascular (44%) pathology, while 11 (5%) others had an eyelid incision primarily for tumors (82%) or vascular lesion (18%). The lateral canthus incision was utilized in the remaining 49 (23%) patients, primarily for middle fossa tumor resection (60%), followed by pathologies extending in both the intracranial and intraorbital compartment (32%), and purely intraorbital lesions (8%). In total, 127 tumors were treated, and gross total resection was achieved in 71%. Tumors comprised mainly meningiomas (70%), followed by schwannomas (7%) and glial neoplasms (5%). Sixty-two patients harboring 74 aneurysms were treated, with the majority being in the anterior communicating artery complex (43%), followed by the posterior communicating artery (22%), and internal carotid artery terminus (16%). Mean follow-up was 18.9 months, and the average length of stay was 4.4 days, with elective cases requiring shorter hospitalization (mean = 3.2 days) and subarachnoid hemorrhage cases the longest (mean = 19 days). Regarding the cumulative approach-related postoperative complication rates, wound infection occurred in 6% of cases, diplopia in 2%, pseudomeningocele in 2%, ptosis in 2%, and cerebrospinal fluid leak in 1.4%. Cement placement was the main contributor to wound infections, and the incidence dropped dramatically after its discontinuation, with only a 2% infection rate observed over the last 5 years.

Conclusions: Transorbital approaches offer adequate anterior and middle skull base and anterior circulation vascular exposure while also providing the benefits of a minimally invasive technique. This large series validates previous anatomical studies and confirms the effectiveness of transorbital surgery as a route to the skull base.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved