• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2027 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Proffered Presentations

2026 Proffered Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

S081: SURGICAL MATERIAL SELECTION TO MINIMIZE REVISION RATES IN SUPERIOR SEMICIRCULAR CANAL DEHISCENCE REPAIR: INSIGHTS FROM THE LARGEST DATABASE
Simon Han; Mahlet Mekonnen; Laila Khorasani; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Introduction: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a rare neurologic condition affecting <2% of the population. Characterized by a pathologic bony opening in the semicircular canal, SSCD produces debilitating auditory and vestibular symptoms that severely impact quality of life. Surgical repair, via sealing, resurfacing, plugging, or capping, aims to restore physiologic fluid dynamics. Commonly used materials include bone chip, bone flap, bone wax, transversalis fascia, and IQ dome; however, the optimal material combination to minimize revision rates (RR) remains unclear.

Objective: To identify surgical repair material combinations associated with the lowest RR using the largest reported SSCD database to date.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 600 SSCD repairs performed jointly by a head and neck surgeon and neurosurgeon at UCLA Medical Center (2011–2024). Data collected included demographics, surgical repair materials, and RR. Fisher’s exact test was applied to evaluate differences between material cohorts.

Results: Among 600 SSCD repair cases, material selection demonstrated a measurable impact on revision rates. Repairs using bone chip and bone wax (n = 260) showed a 5% RR (p = 0.04), while repairs with bone wax and IQ dome (n = 224) had an 11.61% RR (p = 0.0057). In comparison, the cohort repaired with bone chip, bone wax, and transversalis fascia (n = 32) had a 9.38% RR, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.727). Other material combinations, though represented by smaller sample sizes, demonstrated variability in revision outcomes but lacked sufficient power for definitive statistical conclusions.

Conclusions: This analysis, the largest SSCD surgical outcomes study to date, demonstrates that material selection significantly influences revision rates. Bone chip with bone wax and bone wax with IQ dome were associated with the most significant differences in RR compared to other groups. These findings highlight that specific combinations may offer more reliable long-term durability, informing surgical decision-making for SSCD repair.

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved