• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P436: AUTOMATED PERFORMANCE METRICS ON THE CYRANO SIMULATOR DIFFERENTIATE EXPERTISE IN ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL SURGERY
Myriam Agunaoun1; Cecile Rumeau, MD2; Romain Renkes2; Patrice Gallet2; Valentin Favier1; Julien Boetto, MD1; 1CHU Montpellier; 2CHU Nancy

Background: Simulation provides a safe and standardized environment for surgical training. The Cyrano simulator has demonstrated face and construct validity. Its latest version integrates automated motion tracking and scoring, offering the potential for objective assessment of surgical skills.

Objectives: To determine whether automated performance scores on the Cyrano simulator can distinguish between intermediate and expert surgeons, as defined by video-based Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS-v).

Methods: Twenty-nine residents and ENT surgeons completed four endoscopic endonasal exercises on the Cyrano simulator: Target the Target (telescope navigation), Captain Hook and Drag’n Drop (forceps/telescope precision), and Chicken Run (drilling precision). Automated global and sub-scores (amplitude, fluidity, tremor, precision, safety) were derived from motion sensors and task-specific metrics. Independent blinded experts rated anonymized videos using OSATS-v. Participants were categorized as intermediate (IP, OSATS-v ≤15) or expert (EP, OSATS-v ≥16). Group differences were tested using Mann–Whitney U (p<0.05).

Results: Mean simulator scores were higher in EPs (68.2%) than IPs (57.1%). Significant differences favored EPs in Captain Hook (global: 81.8% vs 56.1%, p=0.029; subscores: errors, handling, amplitude, optic precision), Drag’n Drop (global: 79.6% vs 57.3%; opening subscore p=0.030), and Target the Target (optic motor score, p=0.040). Chicken Run showed no group discrimination.

Conclusion: Automated performance analysis on the Cyrano simulator, combining global and skill-specific metrics, can differentiate intermediate from expert performance. It may represent a valuable adjunct for objective assessment in endoscopic endonasal surgery training.

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved