• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P337: OUTCOMES OF THE SUPRAORBITAL APPROACH FOR INTRA-AXIAL LESIONS: A RETROSPECTIVE SERIES
Hunter Brooks; Kaushik Ravipati, MD; Fareed Jumah, MD; Michael Chicoine, MD; Steven Carr, MD; University of Missouri - Columbia School of Medicine

Introduction: The supraorbital (SO) craniotomy is a keyhole approach widely used for extra-axial pathologies. Its role for intra-axial pathology is less characterized. We report a single-center experience examining feasibility, extent of resection, and perioperative morbidity using SO for intra-axial lesions.

Methods: Retrospective review of SO craniotomies for intra-axial lesions at our institute between 2014–2025. Demographics, pathology, lesion size, operative metrics, complications, disposition, and radiographically determined extent of resection were abstracted.

Results: Nine patients (mean age 59.1 ± 19.5 years; 4 male) underwent SO craniotomy for intra-axial pathology. All lesions were frontal lobe; mean maximum diameter 4.0 ± 1.4 cm (1.8–6.0). Pathologies: metastases (n=4), gliomas (n=3), ependymoma (n=1), abscess (n=1). Mean operative time 259.4 ± 95.6 min (170–440); estimated blood loss 56.7 ± 58.6 mL (10–200). Stereotactic navigation used in all cases; microscope in 7/9 (77.8%). No 30-day mortalities, perioperative strokes, surgical-site infections, or CSF leaks. Minor approach-related complications: ptosis (1/9), transient frontalis weakness (1/9), mild frontalis weakness (2/9), transient forehead numbness (1/9), mild forehead numbness (2/9). Gross total resection (GTR) in 5/8 (62.5%) and near total resection in 3/8 (37.5%) tumor cases; the abscess was drained, irrigated, and debrided. Disposition: 7/9 (77.8%) discharged home; 2/9 to inpatient rehabilitation. Modified Rankin score of 1.6 ± 1.5 (0–4) at discharge.

Conclusion: In carefully selected frontal intra-axial lesions, the SO craniotomy provided effective access with high GTR rates and low morbidity in this series. These findings support the SO approach as a viable minimally invasive corridor for intra-axial lesions and justify larger studies to define indications and limits.

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved