• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P331: 3D NAVIGATION-GUIDED VOLUMETRIC AND ANGULAR QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF NASOFRONTAL TREPHINATION, SUBLABIAL CONTRALATERAL TRANSMAXILLARY, AND SUBTARSAL CONTRALATERAL TRANSMAXILLARY APPROACHES TO THE SKULL BASE AND UPPER CERVICAL SPINE
Loong Siow Ping, MD; Moataz D Abouammo, MD, MSc; Sofia Pangallo, MD; Mohammad Bilal Alsavaf, MD; Je Beom Hong, MD; Yong-Li Wang, MD; Rodrigo D Gehrke, MD; Kyle K VanKoevering, MD; Kyle C Wu, MD; Daniel M Prevedello, MD, MBA; Ricardo L Carrau, MD, MBA; The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center

Figure 1: Surgical Approaches. A, nasofrontal incision; B, sublabial contralateral transmaxillary; C, subtarsal contralateral transmaxillary; AWMS, anterior wall of maxillary sinus; C, medial canthus; FB, frontal bone; IOF, infraorbital foramen; NB, nasal bone; N, nose; OF, orbital floor; PWMS, posterior wall of maxillary sinus; STI, subtarsal incision.

Figure 2: Each segment (yellow, green and blue) represents the maximum spatial reach of an approach. Yellow segment: Nasofrontal approach, green segment: Contralateral sublabial transmaxillary approach, purple segment: Contralateral subtarsal transmaxillary approach.

Background: Recent advances in endoscopic skull base surgery have enabled access to difficult to access anatomy. While the sublabial contralateral transmaxillary (SL-CTM) approach is well established, the nasofrontal trephination (NFT) and subtarsal contralateral transmaxillary (ST-CTM) approaches offer novel corridors whose spatial reach and angular capacities remain undefined.

Objective: To perform a 3D navigation-guided volumetric and angular analysis of NFT, SL-CTM, and ST-CTM approaches to quantify and compare their anatomical reach and assist surgical decision-making.

Methods: Five latex-injected cadaveric heads were dissected using each approach. Pre-dissection CT imaging and a stereotactic navigation system facilitated precise annotation of reachable anatomical landmarks. Using 3D Slicer software, fiducial points were reconstructed into three-dimensional models to measure accessible volumes and instrument angulation in coronal and sagittal planes.

Results: NFT approach achieved the highest mean accessible volume (156,643 mm³), followed by SL-CTM (134,982 mm³) and ST-CTM (111,458.5 mm³). NFT also demonstrated the greatest vertical angular reach (113.64° ± 29.45°), while SL-CTM achieved the broadest horizontal angulation (109.4° ± 13.36°). SL-CTM provided superior [KW1] lateral access to the paramedian skull base, whereas NFT extended further caudally toward the odontoid and craniovertebral junction. ST-CTM offered intermediate performance in both dimensions.

Conclusion: The NFT approach offers significant vertical access to midline caudal skull base lesions, making it a useful adjunct to endonasal routes.  SL-CTM approach provides enhanced lateral reach, ideal for petrous apex and paramedian targets. This study introduces a reproducible navigation-based volumetric modelling methodology to guide approach selection and optimize operative planning.

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved