• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P330: NASOFRONTAL TREPHINATION, A NOVEL ENDOSCOPIC APPROACH TO THE SKULL BASE AND UPPER CERVICAL SPINE: TECHNICAL NOTES IN A CADAVERIC MODEL
Moataz D Abouammo, MD, MSc; Loong Siow Ping, MD; Mohammad Bilal Alsavaf, MD; Je Beom Hong, MD; Yong-Li Hong, MD; Rodrigo D Gehrke, MD; Kyle K VanKoevering, MD; Kyle C Wu, MD; Daniel M Prevedello, MD, MBA; Ricardo L Carrau, MD; The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center

Background: Endoscopic skull base surgery has evolved significantly, with various approaches developed to access complex lesions. Nasofrontal trephination (NFT) is a novel adjunctive technique that provides access to paramedian skull base structures and the craniovertebral junction. This approach was conceived to address limitations of existing methods, such as orbital compression risks in transorbital approaches, by shifting the entry point medially to the nasal bridge and medial canthus. NFT offers superior angulation for midline and inferiorly located lesions, including the odontoid process and C4 vertebra, while minimizing risks to critical structures.

Methods: The study utilized a cadaveric model to evaluate the NFT technique. A 2 cm skin incision was made below the brow, extending inferomedially to expose the confluence of the frontal process of the maxilla, frontal bone, and nasal bone. A high-speed drill created a bony window, which was expanded to approximately 1.5 cm in width and 2 cm in height, with care taken to avoid the nasolacrimal apparatus. The approach allowed for instrument insertion and endoscope placement, either as a standalone corridor or in combination with the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA). Instrument maneuverability, angulation, and reach were assessed, including vertical and horizontal movements.

Results: NFT provided favorable vertical angulation (113.64° ± 29.45°) for accessing midline lesions, with successful cadaveric reach to the rostrum (40.04 ± 4.97 mm), odontoid process (97.38 ± 8.74 mm), and contralateral foramen lacerum (73.76 ± 5.47 mm). The approach enabled access to the lateral recess of the sphenoid, petrous apex, jugular tubercle, and craniovertebral junction. However, limitations included r [Figure 4: Instrumentation. A, Instruments insertion via an NFT entry in a skull; B, Instruments insertion via an NFT entry in a cadaver; C, Vertical movement of instruments via the NFT; D, Horizontal movement of instruments via the NFT.] educed instrument maneuverability due to the bony confines and potential instrument fencing. The proximity of the nasolacrimal duct and the need for a facial incision were noted as drawbacks.

Conclusion: Nasofrontal trephination is a promising adjunct to existing skull base approaches, particularly for paramedian and inferiorly located lesions. While it does not replace primary techniques like EEA, it enhances surgical options by providing superior angulation and minimizing risks to critical structures. Further clinical studies are needed to validate its efficacy and refine instrumentation to overcome current limitations. NFT represents a valuable addition to the skull base surgeon's armamentarium, offering a safe and effective alternative for challenging anatomical targets.

Figure 1: NFT skin incision. A, Incision length of 2 cm; B, Exposure of confluence of three bones which are the frontal process of the maxilla, the frontal bone and the nasal bone; FB, Frontal bone; NB, Nasal bone.

Figure 2: NFT Bone window. A, Drilling at the point of bony confluence; B, Bone window opening; C, Bone window width and length on a skull; D, Insertion of instrument from the NFT as seen endonasally; E, Length of NFT bone window measured with ball probe; F, Length of bone window measured 2 cm; AEA, Anterior ethmoidal artery; FB, Frontal bone; NB, Nasal bone; NLD, Nasolacrimal duct; *, Skin.

Figure 3: Nasolacrimal apparatus. A, Nasolacrimal duct seen anterior and inferior to NFT opening; B, Expansion of the bone window endonasally allows for more instrument maneuverability; AEA, Anterior ethmoidal artery; NLD, Nasolacrimal duct; S, Nasal septum; *, Skin

Figure 4: Instrumentation. A, Instruments insertion via an NFT entry in a skull; B, Instruments insertion via an NFT entry in a cadaver; C, Vertical movement of instruments via the NFT; D, Horizontal movement of instruments via the NFT.

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved