• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P275: DEEP FENESTRATION OF CRANIOPHARYNGIOMA CYSTS DOES NOT ALTER RECURRENCE RISK AFTER RESECTION: A SINGLE INSTITUTION COHORT STUDY
Omar Selim, BS; Briana A Santo, PhD; Mazin Elshareif, BS; Austin Carmichael, BS; Taha Khalilullah, BS; Ritvik Pulya, BS; Yves Greatti, MS; Connor Liu, MD; A. Karim Ahmed, MD; Debraj Mukherjee, MD; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Introduction: In patients with craniopharyngioma (CP), cyst fenestration is often performed during surgery. Whether or not piercing the cyst through both the near and far walls into a CSF space (deep fenestration) affects recurrence is unknown.  

Objective: To assess the association between deep fenestration and recurrence, stratified by extent of resection (EOR). 

Methods: We retrospectively identified 80 patients who underwent surgery for craniopharyngioma at our institution between 1/1/2015 and 1/1/2025. “Deep fenestration” was defined as creation of a communication through both cyst walls. “No deep fenestration” included punctures or single wall openings. Patients were stratified by EOR into gross total and near total resection (GTR and NTR; n=40) and subtotal resection (STR; n=40). Primary outcomes were recurrence and time to recurrence (TTR). Group comparisons were performed two-sample tests selected based on normality and equal variance. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated with Kaplan–Meier and compared with log rank testing.

Results: In the GTR cohort, deep fenestration (n=12) vs. no deep fenestration (n=28) showed similar recurrence rates of 33.3% vs 42.9%, respectively (p=0.573). Among those who recurred, median TTR was shorter after deep fenestration (median: 99 days) than without deep fenestration (median: 494.5 days) (p=0.067). In the STR cohort, deep fenestration (n=11) vs. no deep fenestration (n=29) also showed similar recurrence rates of 63.6% vs 55.2%, respectively (p=0.485). The median TTR in the STR cohort was 164 days for the deep fenestration group and 104.5 for the no deep fenestration group. Kaplan-Meier PFS curves showed no significant difference between deep and no deep fenestration in either the GTR/NTR (p=0.126) or STR (p=0.602) comparisons (Figures 1-2). 

Conclusions: Deep fenestration of CP cysts was not associated with lower recurrence in either EOR subgroup. Overall, this data suggests that deep fenestration should not be assumed to mitigate recurrence risk. As a result, its value can be perceived as decompressive rather than disease modifying. Validation of these results in larger, multi-institutional cohorts will be important to further define its clinical utility.

Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curves for the GTR/NTR Cohort

Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curves for the STR Cohort

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved