• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NASBS

NASBS

North American Skull Base Society

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission Statement
    • Bylaws
    • NASBS Board of Directors
    • Committees
      • Committee Interest Form
    • NASBS Policy
    • Donate Now to the NASBS
    • Contact Us
  • Meetings
    • 2026 Annual Meeting
    • Abstracts
      • 2026 Call for Abstracts
      • NASBS Poster Archives
      • 2025 Abstract Awards
    • 2026 Recap
    • NASBS Summer Course
    • Meetings Archive
    • Other Skull Base Surgery Educational Events
  • Resources
    • Member Survey Application
    • NASBS Travel Scholarship Program
    • Research Grants
    • Fellowship Registry
    • The Rhoton Collection
    • Webinars
      • Research Committee Workshop Series
      • ARS/AHNS/NASBS Sinonasal Webinar
      • Surgeon’s Log
      • Advancing Scholarship Series
      • Trials During Turnover: Webinar Series
    • NASBS iCare Pathway Resources
    • Billing & Coding White Paper
  • Membership
    • Join NASBS
    • Membership Directory
    • Multidisciplinary Teams of Distinction
    • NASBS Mentorship Program
  • Fellowship Match
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Programs
    • NASBS Neurosurgery Skull Base Fellowship Match Application
  • Journal
  • Login/Logout

2026 Poster Presentations

2026 Poster Presentations

 

← Back to Previous Page

 

P251: GRADED CSF LEAK REPAIR IN ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL BASE SURGERIES: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE SURGEON'S EXPERIENCE WITH SIMPLE AND EXTENDED APPROACHES TO THE SKULL BASE
Breanna L Sheldon, MD, MS1; Manlin Shao, BS2; Royal Pipaliya, MD3; Kareem El-Naamani1; Christopher Le, MD3; Michael B Avery, MD, MSc1; 1University of Arizona, Department or Neurosurgery; 2University of Arizona College of Medicine; 3University of Arizona, Department of Otolaryngology

Introduction: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks remain an important concern in skull-base surgeries. An effective graded CSF leak repair for endoscopic endonasal (EEA) approaches to the sellar/parasellar region has previously been described, but there is limited reporting on efficacy for more extensive approaches.1 We review outcomes using this graded repair across a range of standard and extended EEAs.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent EEA to the anterior skull base between November 2021-May 2025. Intraoperative CSF leaks were graded as 0 (no leak), 1 (small leak confirmed by Valsalva), 2 (moderate leak with diaphragmatic defect), 3 (large leak).1 Repair materials used included collagen sponge, autologous fat graft, and a rigid buttress of septal bone or Medpor (Stryker, Kalamazoo, USA). Demographics, surgical approach, pathology, repair details and postoperative CSF leak occurrence at discharge and follow-up were collected. Fisher’s exact test or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare characteristics between patients who experienced CSF leak versus those who did not. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Ninety-four patients underwent 99 surgeries. Average age was 60 years (range 44-68) and there was a slight female predominance (50/94, 53.1%). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.2±8.4 kg/m2. Thirty-four patients (36.2%) had previously undergone sinus or skull base surgery and 13 (13.8%) had prior local radiation. The most common indication for surgery was benign pituitary tumor (49/99, 49.5%), followed by nasopharyngeal carcinoma (10/99, 10.1%), meningioma (9/99, 9.1%), encephalocele (5/99, 5.1%), esthesioneuroblastoma (4/99, 4.0%), craniopharyngioma (3/99, 3.0%), and other (19/99, 19.2%).

Surgical approaches included transsphenoidal (57/99, 57.6%), transpterygoid (13/99, 13.1%), transclival (11/99, 11.1%), transtuberculum/transplanum (9/99, 9.1%), and transcribriform (9/99, 9.1%). Thirty-seven patients (37.4%) had an intraoperative CSF leak. Nine (24.3%) were Grade 1, 10 (27.0%) were Grade 2, and 18 (48.6%) were Grade 3. All transtuberculum/transplanum and transcribriform approaches had intraoperative CSF leaks of at least grade 2.

Immediate post-operative repair failure was noted in one patient (2.7%) who had a grade 1 leak intraoperatively and was immediately taken back to the operating room.

Zero patients had CSF leak at hospital discharge, 2-week follow-up (N=96), or at 3-month follow-up (N=90). Nasoseptal flaps were used in nineteen cases (19/99, 19.2%). These were used mostly in grade 3 leaks (15/19, 79.0%) with 4 usages in Grade 2 leaks (21.0%).

Conclusion: This established intraoperative CSF leak repair strategy is effective for extended endoscopic skull-base approaches. Effective wedging of the rigid buttress is paramount to success. Tailoring the repair based on leak grade can minimize morbidity and avoid unnecessary nasoseptal flap harvest, preserving this for future use.

REFERENCES:

1.         Conger A, Zhao F, Wang X, et al. Evolution of the graded repair of CSF leaks and skull base defects in endonasal endoscopic tumor surgery: trends in repair failure and meningitis rates in 509 patients. Journal of neurosurgery. Mar 1 2019;130(3):861-875. doi:10.3171/2017.11.Jns172141

View Poster

 

← Back to Previous Page

Copyright © 2026 North American Skull Base Society · Managed by BSC Management, Inc · All Rights Reserved